Contorted reasoning

Discussion

January 26, 2007

Rodney Hebert The Port Arthur News Fri Jan 26, 2007, 11:43 AM CST

A Jan.14 newspaper column by conservative columnist David Brooks concerning The Bush Administration's new Iraq policy is a classic example of contorted reasoning. Basically, Brooks says that because Democrats have not presented a viable alternative to the Bush plan, defined I suppose as one with which Republicans can agree, they will be partially responsible if the Bush plan fails.

Bush has never given serious consideration to the opinions or suggestions of anyone outside of his own appointed inner circle of advisers, particularly when it comes to his Iraq policy. This is evidenced by his response to The 9/11 Commission Report as well as the more recent recommendations of the bi partisan congressional committee on Iraq. Consequently, if the current Bush plan fails, it will be the sole responsibility of the Bush Administration.

David Brooks' attempt to assign blame for the possible failure of the plan makes about as much sense as saying that if an arsonist sets your house afire and you fail to douse the flames you are partly to blame for your loss. Does Brooks really believe anyone would buy into that argument? Whatever happened to the Republican Creed of taking responsibility for one's own actions?

Rodney Hebert

Port Neches

Text Only

Letters to the Editor

District 36 voters have many choices...or not
May 22, 2012
Sanitation workers give display of Americanism
November 30, 2011
Should Obama get credit or blame?
In a long Saturday Nov. 12 feature column, the writer suggested that President Obama "could only take credit or blame for those things that are the result of his ideas." He then listed twelve items for consideration in making that assessment. An only slightly edited version of those twelve items will make them more useful for that purpose and that version follows. (1) President Obama inherited Bush's Great Recession....which had actually been created, not by Bush, but by a failed seventy year experiment in socialism. (2) He stabilized the banking system....using borrowed money. (3) He extended unemployment benefits....using borrowed money. (4) He reduced taxes....using borrowed money. (5) He signed a health-care law....funded by borrowed money. (6) A nuclear arms treaty was signed with the Soviet Union....which had been defeated by Ronald Reagan twenty years ago. (7) Job loss steadily decreased and eventually has resulted in job gains....among government workers and funded by borrowed money. (8) Obama saved the three American auto companies....using borrowed money. (9) He passed a stimulus plan....using borrowed money. (10) Several Al Qaeda leaders were killed....by our remarkable military teams trained during the Bush Administration. (11) The President is trying to solve the nation's short and long-term economic problems....using borrowed money. (12) President Obama has been willing to compromise....in order to raise taxes or borrow more money.
Based on the writer's list, does President Obama deserve credit or blame?
Ramon Hill
Port Arthur

November 23, 2011
From Internet taxes to the FLEA Party
November 3, 2011
Our children need protection
October 21, 2011
Congratulations on UIL marching contest
October 21, 2011
Gov. Perry shows lifetime of commitment to America
October 6, 2011
Victim’s wife thanks jury members
September 22, 2011
Sunday page covered many topics
September 22, 2011
Local family SHAREs home with Belgium student
August 11, 2011
More Letters to the Editor Headlines

Letters to the Editor

Search Results

Discussion

Contorted reasoning

Site Map

Contact Us