I recently looked at the so called free trade in the country, since I do represent workers. I pondered just how free it really is.
I thought our politicians were supposed to protect and serve the people of this country. Apparently I was wrong. NAFTA and some World Trade Agreements have really killed our country. We are losing many jobs and companies. In NAFTA, it was supposed to help equalize Mexico, Canada and the United States. Well, it sure did not help. The American worker was making just about $22 an hour average. Canada was about a dollar behind that, but with better benefits. Mexico was making around $2.60 an hour. So what do you think happened? Most of the companies fled to Mexico.
Well low and behold, more politicians made a deal with other countries like China. They make about 62 cents an hour on average. So now were do you think the companies have gone? You guessed it. Look at the recalls and dangerous threat to our food and toys and other supplies. Pretty smart, right? Big business continues to try to find workers who work cheaper and cheaper and did it decrease the cost? Not much. Take for example sneakers. The imports are pennies less than American made. Who gets all the profit? You guessed it.
Guess why more Mexican workers are risking their lives to cross the border. The loss of jobs now in their country is so great they have lost what they had.
So now I ask, is it really free trade? Lost jobs, lost companies and a deficit out of this world. Imagine if China, not much different than your bank, decided to claim default on your loan. You lose it right. So what if China says enough is enough and cuts us off? Wow, what a depression we would be in. So who does benefit? Not the American worker. So remember when you vote. The love of money is the root of all evil. Amen.
Michael Doggett
Carpenters Local Union No. 502
Letters to the Editor
Free trade costing American workers
- Letters to the Editor
-
- District 36 voters have many choices...or not
- Sanitation workers give display of Americanism
-
Should Obama get credit or blame?
In a long Saturday Nov. 12 feature column, the writer suggested that President Obama "could only take credit or blame for those things that are the result of his ideas." He then listed twelve items for consideration in making that assessment. An only slightly edited version of those twelve items will make them more useful for that purpose and that version follows. (1) President Obama inherited Bush's Great Recession....which had actually been created, not by Bush, but by a failed seventy year experiment in socialism. (2) He stabilized the banking system....using borrowed money. (3) He extended unemployment benefits....using borrowed money. (4) He reduced taxes....using borrowed money. (5) He signed a health-care law....funded by borrowed money. (6) A nuclear arms treaty was signed with the Soviet Union....which had been defeated by Ronald Reagan twenty years ago. (7) Job loss steadily decreased and eventually has resulted in job gains....among government workers and funded by borrowed money. (8) Obama saved the three American auto companies....using borrowed money. (9) He passed a stimulus plan....using borrowed money. (10) Several Al Qaeda leaders were killed....by our remarkable military teams trained during the Bush Administration. (11) The President is trying to solve the nation's short and long-term economic problems....using borrowed money. (12) President Obama has been willing to compromise....in order to raise taxes or borrow more money.
Based on the writer's list, does President Obama deserve credit or blame?
Ramon Hill
Port Arthur - From Internet taxes to the FLEA Party
- Our children need protection
- Congratulations on UIL marching contest
- Gov. Perry shows lifetime of commitment to America
- Victim’s wife thanks jury members
- Sunday page covered many topics
- Local family SHAREs home with Belgium student
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines


